'The CPA might do a fundraiser for a zoom lens' – Adam Hansen urges fans not to blame riders as motorbike controversy resurfaces

The controversy surrounding the influence of motorbikes during professional cycling races has reignited following recent comments from riders at the Tour de Romandie. Valentin Paret-Peintre and Luke Plapp both highlighted the significant advantage that motorbikes positioned near the peloton can provide, particularly through slipstream effects that can alter race dynamics and outcomes. These observations have brought renewed attention to the longstanding debate over the role and placement of motorbikes in races, especially regarding their proximity to riders. Adam Hansen, president of the Association of Professional Cyclists (CPA), has called on fans to refrain from blaming riders for benefiting from motorbike slipstreams. He emphasised that cyclists are entitled to position themselves freely on the road and that any issues with motorbike proximity are the responsibility of race organisers, not the athletes. Hansen criticised the management of motorbikes during events, describing it as poorly handled and likening races to sporting contests rather than film productions, where the presence of motorbikes should not interfere with competition. The UCI’s current regulations do not specify a minimum distance that television motorbikes must maintain from riders, only advising that they film from a 3/4 angle and avoid interfering with the race or providing slipstream advantages. Hansen suggested, somewhat humorously, that the CPA might consider fundraising to help production crews invest in better zoom lenses to reduce the need for motorbikes to get so close to the riders. This remark underscores the ongoing tension between media coverage needs and fair competition. Luke Plapp acknowledged that riders often “play the game” when motorbikes are nearby but was candid about the situation at Romandie, describing the peloton’s pace as “unbelievable” and the influence of motorbikes as excessive. He noted that the presence of motorbikes led to unusually high speeds and rapidly shrinking time gaps, which he characterised as somewhat farcical. The discussion highlights broader concerns within the cycling community about maintaining the integrity of race conditions amid the logistical challenges of live broadcasting.